Petition against CCP nominated councillors: HC verdict on 11th July

1
732

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Goa comprising Justice M.S Sonak and Justice R.N. Laddha will on Monday July 11th pronounce the judgment on the petition filed by Adv. Aires Rodrigues challenging the appointment of Kabir Makhija and Kishore Sastry as nominated Councilors at the Corporation of the City of Panaji (CCP).

Adv. Aires Rodrigues in his petition has submitted that the appointment of Kabir Makhija and Kishore Sastry as nominated Councillors was in total breach and violation of law as they did not possess the required Special knowledge and experience in Municipal Administration.

Adv. Rodrigues also submitted that while Kishore Sastry in his biodata had stated that his educational qualification was I.T.I in Electricals besides a municipal councilor for one term, that Kabir Makhija had stated that besides a diploma in Civil Engineering he was a Sportsman and did modeling at various events including the Lakme Fashion Week while also being a Councilor for one term.

Adv. Rodrigues further submitted that Kishor Sastry had lost the CCP elections held in March 2021 while Kabir Makhija’s ward, having been reserved for women, was contested by his sister who was also defeated.

Adv. Aires Rodrigues in his petition has also challenged the very validity of Section 9 (1) (b) of the CCP Act which makes a provision to nominate up to five Councilors having special knowledge or experience in municipal administration, engineering, architecture, archaeology, heritage etc, while drawing the attention of the High Court that this provision was violative of Article 243R of the Constitution of India which enables a non-elected member to be given a representation in a Municipality only if having Special knowledge or experience in Municipal Administration.

1 COMMENT

  1. Corrupt Government Officials are the reason for Goans sufferings. They take months or even years to pass one simple file of Goans, which require only few days to pass. Without bribes they even not looking at the Goans face, forget about completing the file of the Goans. Whenever Goans goes to the office, next chair employee says that he or She is on outdoor work. But actually he or she is at home or doing some of its personal business outdoor. They must be punctual and if he or she is gone out or on leave then there must be a replacement to sign or work on his or her behalf.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here